Cheeky Harry cartoon from Malaysia, 1983

Dear friends, given the recent hullabaloo over the arrest of a Singaporean cartoonist, and the fact that it’s Labour Day, I thought I might share a somewhat naughty cartoon that pokes fun of Lee Kuan Yew’s handling of workers (Pekerja), the opposition (Pembangkang), minority cultures (Kaum minoriti) and Chinese education (Pendidikan Cina).

This is the front cover of the Feb 1983 issue of a now defunct Malaysian bilingual monthly publication, Nadi Insan. This hangs on the “Press Freedom Wall” in Malaysiakini‘s KL office.

No disrespect to the old man; but I always find it interesting to see depictions of Malaysia and Singapore (and our leaders) by the other side.

Nadi Insan

I have so many questions about this cartoon: Did LKY do something particularly nasty in late 1982 to provoke this cover? What exactly does the caricature represent? It seems like he’s wearing a sumo outfit, but with the face and fangs of one of those scary Indonesian monsters. Comments, thoughts much appreciated.

Sumana, my best friend, and I visited Malaysiakini’s office in Sept 2011. We were there to interview Steven Gan, one of the co-founders of Malaysiakini, and probably one of the braver and more inspirational people I’ve met in Malaya. I write about Malaysiakini and Steven in some detail in Floating on a Malayan Breeze, my first book.

(Malaysiakini, for the benefit of my foreign friends, is an Internet news pioneer in Malaya. It broke the Malaysian government’s stranglehold over media and communication in the early 2000s, and has played a key role in the country’s political awakening. It also experimented and found a fairly sustainable Internet newspaper business model.)

Here is a shot of Steven and I chatting in front of the Press Freedom Wall.

Steven Me Press Freedom Wall

As you might imagine, I find it quite interesting–if not altogether surprising–that this cover should have pride of place on Malaysiakini’s Press Freedom Wall.

Going back to Leslie, of course, as a writer, I find it depressing that our government wants to lock up a fellow artist. Even more worrying to me is the number of Singaporeans who feel that Leslie is not a real artist, or that the Singapore government should be the one to decide what is legitimate art and what is not.

In any case, thanks, Malaysiakini. Let’s have a laugh, and then carry on with our Labour Day…

Advertisements

2 responses

  1. May I ask a question?

    Is Gilbert Goh an artist?

    Is the SDP website a series of works of art?

    If not, would changing their medium to pictures change your view? 😀

    Leslie Chew is not an artist lah. I would stand by the view that he’s a political actor doing so in pictures (computer-aided) …

    • As far as I can tell, he’s a political cartoonist. I believe that qualifies as art. If every artist who depicts politics or political scenes or imagery or metaphors is “a political actor” in your view, then sure, Leslie Chew is a political actor.

      Anyway, people do not have to agree on the definition of “art”. Really in the eyes of the beholder. And it’s certainly not the government’s place to decide.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: